My point is, I don't think Jesus needs to be an enemy of the Wiccan faith. He could even be an ally. The orthodox Jesus, well, yeah...that's a problem, but it's also manure.
Having grown up with Jesus as a child (figuratively speaking of course), I became friends with him. I agreed with many of the moral things that he supposedly stood for. When I left Christianity I took Jesus with me. But not as "The Christ".
Your thread is entitled "Christ and Wicca", not "Jesus and Wicca". I personally don't see how anyone could believe that Jesus was "The Christ" and even be interested in Wicca at all. I mean, if Jesus was "The Christ" then he was the only begotten son of the God of Abraham who is "God the Father" who proclaims to be a jealous God, etc, etc, etc. So it seem to me personally that to even be interested in Wicca when one believes in the jealous Hebrew God of Abraham is fundamentally incompatible. Although I know that some people do seem to claim to be able to do that.
For me, Jesus was not "The Christ". He was not the son of the God of Abraham, nor to I believe in the God of Abraham anymore than I believe in Zeus.
However, I do believe that there very well may have been a person who sparked those absurd rumors. And that person was most likely a Jewish Mahayana Buddhist Bodhisattva. I have very powerful historical reasons for believing this. I believe that "Jesus" was a Mahayana Buddhist who renounced the immoral teachings of the Torah and the God of Abraham, and tried to replace them with the far higher morals of Mahayana Buddhism. I believe that he probably did call the Pharisees hypocrites, and he probably was crucified for blaspheme. I do not believe that he was born of a virgin, raised from the dead, nor had anything at all to do with the fictitious God of Abraham.
So I keep Jesus with me as a sort of personal friend. Not unlike the Buddha. I do use Jesus as an archetype in my Wicca paradigm, as I also used Buddha. In fact, I often envision Buddha and Jesus together at the same time as best-friends. Along with other sages like Confucius, and Lao Tzu. I don't view any of these archetypes to be "gods", but I do view them as being viable vessels for spiritual communique possible with the spirits of these very people or perhaps other facets of consciousness that find these psychic vessels appropriate for communique.
So yes, Jesus is definitely a part of my own personal Wicca paradigm. But certainly not as "The Christ". I dismiss that very notion as being a totally false rumor.
I use Jesus in two specific roles in my paradigm. In one role he plays the Fatherly Figure of Capricorn. And he fits that roll perfectly because he himself is supposedly a Capricorn, plus he supposedly teaches that we should attempt to create "Heaven on Earth", which is my personal interpretation of Capricorn's message. I'm using the Zodiac here as abstractly a "journey of the God", and not as a personal birth sign.
The other role I use Jesus for is as the Hierophant as in Torah and the journey of the fool. But I don't use him exclusively for that role. In fact, he shares that roll with the other characters I mentioned above, Buddha, Confucius, and Lao Tzu and others. I don't view the Hierophant as being a single authoritative figure (like a pope), but instead it can be any sage that has wisdom to offer. So in my paradigm Jesus is just one of many Hierophants.
So Jesus, yes. The Christ, no.
That's my answer to you question.
(And clearly I'm not even restricting "Jesus" to the New Testament rumors. I don't believe that everything stated in those rumors are true about "Jesus")
So in that sense I'm really not even speaking about the "Biblical Jesus", but rather about a possible Mahayana Buddhist Bodhisattva who may have been named "Jesus" and gave rise to the New Testament Gossips after his crucifixion for having renounced the teachings of the Torah and the immoral teachings attributed to the "God of Abraham".
As you can see, I have a truly unique view of who Jesus may have actually been.